The Economist January 16, 2016 (Digital)

It is good for nonUS news but is severely prejudiced against President Trump.

Highly politically biased articles. Please stop masquerading as an objective magazine. I want pure, unfiltered political, economic and financial news, without the magazine's one-sided political viewpoint mixed in with it. I will not be renewing. Going back to Wall Street Journal and Investors' Daily as they are at least balanced when political views have to be interjected into an article in order for the gist of the article is relayed to their readers. Very disappointed. Ciao.

I wished that I could get my money back for a wasted one-year subscription with your magazine.

I was first introduced to The Economist 17 years ago when I was an undergraduate and remember it quite differently. What I really liked about the magazine back then was that I felt I was being informed with facts and data about what was going all around world, even in places I never heard of before. Now it appears that the articles are mostly commentaries. I prefer substantiated facts and supported data rather than someone else's opinion to help me understand what's going on around the world.

Never too much information; always to- the-point in relevance and thought provoking arguments!

We have canceled the subscription and wrote a letter objecting to the cover depicting our President Trump in a totally unacceptable manner. We have just tossed any Economist that have come since as we refuse to support the unreasonable and vicious attacks on our President.

The Economist respects the reader's intelligence and it has a worldly outlook. My father read it all his life.

Great magazine!

Hopefully finish consuming one issue before the next one arrives. Sooo much information to digest. And, so timely.

Always sent me markeingrenew emails but I don't mind as I already use some less expensive method to get it coming.