Magzter Gold (Sitewide AU)
Baseball America (Digital)

Baseball America (Digital)

1 Issue, May 2024

Also available on
MagzterGold logo

Get unlimited access to this article, this issue, + back issues & 9,000+ other magazines and newspapers.

Starting at $14.99/month

Choose a Plan
7-Day No Questions Asked Refund Guarantee.
Learn more

MORE HARM THAN GOOD?

MORE HARM THAN GOOD?
As a prospect in 2021, Reds righthander Hunter Greene never knew how many innings or pitches he was going to get to throw.
Even though he was the hardest-throwing starter in the minor leagues, Greene was told to go get hitters out. Coming off Tommy John surgery in 2019, he threw five innings in his first 2021 start. He threw 99 pitches in his fourth start. He went 7.1 innings and 101 pitches in his fifth, then followed by going 106 pitches in each of his next two.
In modern pitching development, that seems almost reckless. Greene could reach back for 100 mph whenever he wanted, and high velocity equals high stress on elbows. But as then-Reds pitching coordinator Kyle Boddy saw it, it would be safer for Greene to let him worry about getting hitters out in the sixth and seventh innings.
“If he goes 60 or 70 pitches, he’s going to sit 100. He’s not stupid,” said Boddy, now a special assistant to Red Sox GM Craig Breslow. “And if we tell him, ‘There’s no limits on you,’ but we keep taking him out after 70 pitches every time, he’s going to realize what’s going on.
“If he can’t control the volume, the one lever he can control is the intensity. I personally think that’s worse for his arm, going max effort for shorter stints.”
There’s no guarantee that the Reds’ approach will keep Greene healthy for the long term, but it’s worked so far. He’s part of a young Cincinnati rotation that includes Andrew Abbott, Graham Aschcraft and Nick Lodolo. All were asked to throw 95-plus pitches and seven innings in the minors.
Greene is one of the examples that has me wondering if, some 20 years after the end of the pitcher-abuse era, if the pitcher-protection era is any better at actually keeping pitchers healthy.
This April brought bad news for prominent pitchers. Spencer Strider, Eury Perez and Shane Bieber joined Gerrit Cole on the injured list with elbow injuries.
At the same time, the efforts to keep pitchers healthy continue to emphasize placing artificial limits on how much pitchers work in games. In 2023, righthander Paul Skenes threw around 100 pitches and seven innings a week as LSU’s Friday starter. He generally sat at 98 mph.
In April 2024, Skenes, the No. 1 pick in the 2023 draft by the Pirates, sat 100 mph and touched 102 for three-inning stints for Triple-A Indianapolis. He was pulled after three perfect innings and 46 pitches in his 2024 debut. Six starts into the season, Skenes had yet to top 75 pitches in an outing.
The Pirates extended this philosophy to their MLB staff. Rookie righthander Jared Jones was pulled from a start after just 59 pitches—which included 50 strikes—over five one-hit innings. He wasn’t pulled because he was tired. He was pulled in hopes the cumulative workload won’t be as taxing.
The Marlins pulled Max Meyer from their rotation to throw three-to-four innings once a week in Triple-A to try to keep him safe.
The intent is admirable, but we’re now more than a decade into the pitcher-protection era, and I struggle to come up with examples of carefully handled pitchers who have become paradigms of durability.
Stephen Strasburg, the No. 1 pick in the 2009 draft, was famously shut down before the 2012 playoffs in his first year back from Tommy John surgery. He had some excellent years after that and helped the Nationals win a World Series, but he was effectively done as a starter right after he turned 31.
The Orioles famously held Dylan Bundy to three innings per start in 2012, his first pro season. He didn’t allow a hit until his fif...
You're reading a preview of
Baseball America (Digital) - 1 Issue, May 2024

DiscountMags is a licensed distributor (not a publisher) of the above content and Publication through Magzter Inc. Accordingly, we have no editorial control over the Publications. Any opinions, advice, statements, services, offers or other information or content expressed or made available by third parties, including those made in Publications offered on our website, are those of the respective author(s) or publisher(s) and not of DiscountMags. DiscountMags does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, truthfulness, or usefulness of all or any portion of any publication or any services or offers made by third parties, nor will we be liable for any loss or damage caused by your reliance on information contained in any Publication, or your use of services offered, or your acceptance of any offers made through the Service or the Publications. For content removal requests, please contact Magzter.

© 1999 – 2025 DiscountMags.com All rights reserved.